Tag Archives: censorship

google-youtube censorship

It’s a full on attack!

URGENT!  There is a massive migration happening on the net due to new restriction rules on youtube and the law allowing ISPs to sell your personal information.

People are moving over to minds.com and vidme.com

You might want to secure your channel and space now.

ALSO Alt-Google

Sick of Twitter? GAB ($)

.
.


.
.

.

in solidarity Vidme
.
.

Congress Poised To Obliterate Broadband Privacy Rules

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
powers
.

.
.
.
.
.

more information coming soon,  watch for updates…
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1 Comment

Filed under art, business, computers, education, film, general, justice, News, politics, secession, social epistemology, vigilance, war

You Tube’s New Censorship

youtube.jpgA YouTube for All of Us
As a community, we have come to count on each other to be entertained, challenged, and moved by what we watch and share on YouTube. We’ve been thinking a lot lately about how to make the collective YouTube experience even better, particularly on our most visited pages. Our goal is to help ensure that you’re viewing content that’s relevant to you, and not inadvertently coming across content that isn’t. Here are a few things we came up with:

* Stricter standard for mature content – While videos featuring pornographic images or sex acts are always removed from the site when they’re flagged, we’re tightening the standard for what is considered “sexually suggestive.” Videos with sexually suggestive (but not prohibited) content will be age-restricted, which means they’ll be available only to viewers who are 18 or older. To learn more about what constitutes “sexually suggestive” content, click here.

* Demotion of sexually suggestive content and profanity – Videos that are considered sexually suggestive, or that contain profanity, will be algorithmically demoted on our ‘Most Viewed,’ ‘Top Favorited,’ and other browse pages. The classification of these types of videos is based on a number of factors, including video content and descriptions. In testing, we’ve found that out of the thousands of videos on these pages, only several each day are automatically demoted for being too graphic or explicit. However, those videos are often the ones which end up being repeatedly flagged by the community as being inappropriate.

* Improved thumbnails – To make sure your thumbnail represents your video, your choices will now be selected algorithmically. You’ll still have three thumbnails to choose from, but they will no longer be auto-generated from the 25/50/75 points in the video index.

* More accurate video information – Our Community Guidelines have always prohibited folks from attempting to game view counts by entering misleading information in video descriptions, tags, titles, and other metadata. We remain serious about enforcing these rules. Remember, violations of these guidelines could result in removal of your video and repeated violations will lead to termination of your account.

The preservation and improvement of the YouTube experience is a responsibility we share. Let’s work together to ensure that the YouTube community continues to thrive as a positive place for all of us.

youtube

You Tube to Vloggers: “Go F&*$ yourselves!
This will essentially put an end to vlogging on You Tube.
let me preface that, good vlogging

Most creative response so far

opinions and conversations on the topic

1 Comment

Filed under business, history, just wrong, media, politics, social epistemology

Australia to implement mandatory internet censorship

AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.

The revelations emerge as US tech giants Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, and a coalition of human rights and other groups unveiled a code of conduct aimed at safeguarding online freedom of speech and privacy.

The government has declared it will not let internet users opt out of the proposed national internet filter.

The plan was first created as a way to combat child pronography and adult content, but could be extended to include controversial websites on euthanasia or anorexia.

Communications minister Stephen Conroy revealed the mandatory censorship to the Senate estimates committee as the Global Network Initiative, bringing together leading companies, human rights organisations, academics and investors, committed the technology firms to “protect the freedom of expression and privacy rights of their users”.

Mr Conroy said trials were yet to be carried out, but “we are talking about mandatory blocking, where possible, of illegal material.”

The net nanny proposal was originally going to allow Australians who wanted uncensored access to the web the option of contacting their internet service provider to be excluded from the service.

Human Rights Watch has condemned internet censorship, and argued to the US Senate “there is a real danger of a Virtual Curtain dividing the internet, much as the Iron Curtain did during the Cold War, because some governments fear the potential of the internet, (and) want to control it”

Groups including the System Administrators Guild of Australia and Electronic Frontiers Australia have attacked the proposal, saying it would unfairly restrict Australians’ access to the web, slow internet speeds and raise the price of internet access.

EFA board member Colin Jacobs said it would have little effect on illegal internet content, including child pornography, as it would not cover file-sharing networks.

“If the Government would actually come out and say we’re only targeting child pornography it would be a different debate,” he said.

The technology companies’ move, which follows criticism that the companies were assisting censorship of the internet in nations such as China, requires them to narrowly interpret government requests for information or censorship and to fight to minimise cooperation.

The initiative provides a systematic approach to “work together in resisting efforts by governments that seek to enlist companies in acts of censorship and surveillance that violate international standards”, the participants said.

In a statement, Yahoo co-founder and chief executive Jerry Yang welcomed the new code of conduct.

“These principles provide a valuable roadmap for companies like Yahoo operating in markets where freedom of expression and privacy are unfairly restricted,” he said.

“Yahoo was founded on the belief that promoting access to information can enrich people’s lives, and the principles we unveil today reflect our determination that our actions match our values around the world.”

Yahoo was thrust into the forefront of the online rights issue after the Californian company helped Chinese police identify cyber dissidents whose supposed crime was expressing their views online.

China exercises strict control over the internet, blocking sites linked to Chinese dissidents, the outlawed Falun Gong spiritual movement, the Tibetan government-in-exile and those with information on the 1989 Tiananmen massacre.

A number of US companies, including Microsoft, Cisco, Google and Yahoo, have been hauled before the US Congress in recent years and accused of complicity in building the “Great Firewall of China”.

The Australian Christian Lobby, however, has welcomed the proposals.

Managing director Jim Wallace said the measures were needed.

“The need to prevent access to illegal hard-core material and child pornography must be placed above the industry’s desire for unfettered access,” Mr Wallace said.

story

what happen to parental responsibility?

kids should not be on computers, they should be outside playing and when inside reading books!

Leave a comment

Filed under business, computers, Health, history, international, just wrong, media, News, politics, science and technology

You Tube Censorship

More You Tube Censorship Share Videos

This method is cumbersome and time consuming.

There are so few users who actually spam shared videos.

Users can simply block another user if they feel they are being spammed.

Share was one of the best features on You Tube and now that they are cutting the number of people you can share unless you are willing to go through this very cumbersome process, not to mention few people even are aware of the change, and ever fewer users are savvy enough to manage most of the extra features You Tube keeps adding.

Bottom line, the benefits of Sharing outweigh the number of Spamed videos.

You Tube needs to rethink this change.

Leave a comment

Filed under business, just wrong, media, News, video

On Censorship

Censoring Culture: Contemporary Threats to Free Expression

If your idea of censorship is an anonymous bureaucrat in a government office exercising prudish control over “offensive” art and speech, wake up and smell the conglomeration.

Censorship today is just as likely to be the result of a market force or a bandwidth monopoly as a line edit or the covering of a nude sculpture, and the current system of new technologies and economic arrangements has subtle, built-in mechanisms for suppressing free expression as powerful as any known in other centuries.

You Tube Google blocked the Hack – which calls for technology to take up arms and strike back. ITMT, while tech comes up with a plan use TOR to access blocked materials in the US.

And write a letter to Google and your Congress Person, remind them this is the US not China.

Another way you can help is to call your local library and ask them to purchase this book.

pssst… remember Google, do no evil.

Leave a comment

Filed under business, Health, history, international, just wrong, media, politics, science and technology, social epistemology, updates, video