Category Archives: congress

John Kiriakou

Former CIA Official and Whistle-blower John Kiriakou 10 part interview series with by Paul Jay of The Real News
.
.

Part 1 – I Believed America Could Do No Wrong

.
.

Part 2 – How I Joined the CIA

.
.

Part 3 – My Reports on 1995 Human Rights Abuses were Ignored by State Department

.
.

Part 4 – The Iraqi Pissing Match

.
.

Part 5 – Why Didn’t Bush/Cheney Prevent 9/11?

.
.

Part 6 – Sea of Blood

.
.

Part 7 – Iraq War a War Crime – Pushed by Cheney Over Objections of Joint Chiefs

.
.

Part 8 – A Tortured Truth

.
.

Part 9 – Why I Was Targeted by the CIA

.
.

Part 10 – They Won’t Shut Me Up

.
.

watch for updates
John Kiriakou wiki
.
.

spy
.
.
The Double Standard
.
Torture was official US policy
.
Pvt. Manning
.
Edward Snowden
.
Barrett Brown
.
Jeremy Hammond
.
wikileaks
.
The Art Of Enemy Making
.
justice?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Leave a comment

Filed under congress, education, history, international, News, politics, war

Barrett Brown

Journalist Barrett Brown sentenced to 63 months in prison for being a journalist

bbbbA court in Dallas has sentenced Barrett Brown to 63 months in prison.
count one 48 months
count two 12 months
count three 3 months

PLUS He must also pay $890,000 to Stratfor and Combined Security in restitution.
50% percent of all gifts and awards will go till paid in full.

He was sentenced for his relationship with a source who said he was close to the hacker group Anonymous. A group infiltrated and taken over by the FBI: this used to be called entrapment and is/was illegal in the US, but law enforcement owned by Wall Street Banks do what they want in the US. The FBI mine as well be called the Staci now.

For publishing a public link to stolen documents and information by Stratfor Security.

Now we know why Edward Snowden left.

On the FBI Practices:“”This is not the “rule of law”, Your Honor, it is the “rule of law enforcement”, and it is very dangerous.” -Barrett Brown

“The copy of the Declaration of Independence they took from me? Will I get that back?” – Barrett Brown in court  (answer = no).

“Good news! — The U.S. government decided today that because I did such a good job investigating the cyber-industrial complex, they’re now going to send me to investigate the prison-industrial complex. For the next 35 months, I’ll be provided with free food, clothes, and housing as I seek to expose wrong doing by Bureau of Prisons officials and staff and otherwise report on news and culture in the world’s greatest prison system. I want to thank the Department of Justice for having put so much time and energy into advocating on my behalf; rather than holding a grudge against me for the two years of work I put into in bringing attention to a DOJ-linked campaign to harass and discredit journalists like Glenn Greenwald, the agency instead labored tirelessly to ensure that I received this very prestigious assignment. — Wish me luck!” -Barrett Brown

“We need to restore a very rigorous tradition of civil disobedience until reasonable well-informed people are confident that the powerful are not above the law.” Barrett Brown (said on the phone after the trial from prison)

.
.
.


.
.


.
.
wiki echelon2
.
.
links
.
.
vital information
.
.
.
——————
god damn it
bart0115
douglas lucas
bart1216x
bartx

.
Updates live AM 01/22/15
1/22/15 Court Statement
kraut reporter
Free Barrett Brown
Free Speech Is Dead

Front/Burner
FDL
USA Today
Time
Intercept
RT-Martin
Slate
Electronic Frontier
Sparrow Project
Guardian
IBT
Don’t Believe What the Government Says About Barrett Brown
help
.
.

gwletter

.
.
Why he’s important
Why we need his perspective
Why free speech matters

Published on Aug 17, 2012

play all

.
.
If only all of Rome had just one neck
.
.
FreeBarrett
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

thisisnotahat
this is not a hat

.
.
.
afraid?
not enough
.
before I die
.
not too late
.
.
artlol
.
.
.
.
.
B8Df_h7CAAAF160
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Leave a comment

Filed under #OWS, congress, education, history, justice, politics, psychology

The Secret Recordings of Carmen Segarra

hero
segarra

NPR – The Secret Recordings of Carmen Segarra
.
.
the crooks
.
.
Michael Silva don-h-kim

Mike Silva                               Jon Kim

.
.

keep her safe
.
.
.
.
npr and tal have a way of white washing a number of the details,
you know it’s more than what they are telling,
mostly due to both being so much a part of the system.

they are in fact funded by the banking institutions,
keep that in mind.

but do you know what the real sadness of all this is?
absolutely nothing will change,
nothing will happen to any of the players,
the wrong doers.

this folks,
is as good as it’s ever going to get,
we’re stuck.

however,
if by chance you find a way to free yourself,
please,
drop me a note,
let me know how you did it.

thanks
.
.
.
.
.
addendum
bought journalism
.

Leave a comment

Filed under business, congress, debt, education, history, News, politics, war

The Covert Origins of ISIS

By far the most complete and accurate summary on the topic of ISIS

.
amazing stuff
.
The Geopolitics of World War III

Now that we know where we are, where are we going?
.
.

Here’s Where We’ve Been
History and Imperialism

.
.
A very good series called, Search for Destiny is one of the best programs put together regarding the history of the Middles East – Asia Minor – very detailed, much original footage. This is an expensive series to own, however, check your local library, university library or try the inter-library loan program; for a few dollars they will help you find copies of this series and send it to your local library. Many PBS stations also own copies of this series, you might call your local PBS station, ask them to run this series. It also looks like the History Channel purchased a copy, and of course there’s bt. With the endless conflict in the Middle East it may be wise to request that your local library purchase this series so history can be shared.
.
.
.

PLEEEEEEEEEESE LISTEN CAREFULLY

.
.

UPDATE
ISIS v ISIL
IS IS = Islamic State Iraq & Syria

IS IL= Islamic State Iraq and the LEVANT.
say it again, the LEVANT! – – (aka the Fertile Crescent – Mesopotamia – Catland; meow).

ancient
mesopo

Where is the Levant?
Today the Levant is the entire Eastern Mediterranean, that includes; Cyprus, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine/Israel, Southern Turkey and Syria. All the good fertile land.

modern
levant
.
– – Northern Iraq (a.k.a. some day Kurdistan) and West and Southern Iraq; outside the the Fertile Crescent, are not part of the Levant that is why Iraq gets its own letter in ISIL.

sunni shiite
sunishia

 

So basically, when Obama says ISIL instead of ISIS he’s telling every terrorists group he ‘will bomb and kill all you mfers everywhere you go in the middle east, a.k.a. Mesopotamia and Iraq.’

Now, one of the biggest questions is, did the US create ISIS?
The short answer is, yes.

ISIS is good for the business of war, very bad for working, living, minding-your-own-business people.

ISIS is like having a prostitution problem government policies created and arming Jack The Riper to fix it.
(see the video at the top).

.
.

History
British beheadings and terror – aka war trophies

.
.
.
.
.
.
bookmark for updates
see any inaccuracies, please let me know.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Leave a comment

Filed under congress, education, history, international, News, politics, war

Study – US Is an Oligarchy Not a Democracy

oligarchsMajor Study Finds That The US Is An Oligarchy
Zachary Davies Boren

The US government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country’s citizens, but is instead ruled by those of the rich and powerful, a new study from Princeton and Northwestern Universities has concluded.

The report, entitled Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, used extensive policy data collected from between the years of 1981 and 2002 to empirically determine the state of the US political system.

After sifting through nearly 1,800 US policies enacted in that period and comparing them to the expressed preferences of average Americans (50th percentile of income), affluent Americans (90th percentile) and large special interests groups, researchers concluded that the United States is dominated by its economic elite.

The peer-reviewed study, which will be taught at these universities in September, says: “The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence.”

Researchers concluded that US government policies rarely align with the the preferences of the majority of Americans, but do favour special interests and lobbying organizations: “When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the US political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favour policy change, they generally do not get it.”

The positions of powerful interest groups are “not substantially correlated with the preferences of average citizens”, but the politics of average Americans and affluent Americans sometimes does overlap. This merely a coincidence, the report says, with the the interests of the average American being served almost exclusively when it also serves those of the richest 10 per cent.

The theory of “biased pluralism” that the Princeton and Northwestern researchers believe the US system fits holds that policy outcomes “tend to tilt towards the wishes of corporations and business and professional associations.”

The study comes in the wake of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, a controversial piece of legislation passed in The Supreme Court that abolished campaign contribution limits, and record low approval ratings for the US congress.
.
.
Capitalism

.
.
If you’re still supporting the two party duopoly in the US you are not only the problem you are a slave.
.
.

Leave a comment

Filed under congress, education, history, media, News, politics, psychology, serendipity, SPREAD IT!, war

You’re Not Going To Believe This

Social Security, Treasury target taxpayers for their parents’ decades-old debts
By Marc Fisher

A few weeks ago, with no notice, the U.S. government intercepted Mary Grice’s tax refunds from both the IRS and the state of Maryland. Grice had no idea that Uncle Sam had seized her money until some days later, when she got a letter saying that her refund had gone to satisfy an old debt to the government — a very old debt.

When Grice was 4, back in 1960, her father died, leaving her mother with five children to raise. Until the kids turned 18, Sadie Grice got survivor benefits from Social Security to help feed and clothe them.

Now, Social Security claims it overpaid someone in the Grice family — it’s not sure who — in 1977. After 37 years of silence, four years after Sadie Grice died, the government is coming after her daughter. Why the feds chose to take Mary’s money, rather than her surviving siblings’, is a mystery.

Across the nation, hundreds of thousands of taxpayers who are expecting refunds this month are instead getting letters like the one Grice got, informing them that because of a debt they never knew about — often a debt incurred by their parents — the government has confiscated their check.

The Treasury Department has intercepted $1.9 billion in tax refunds already this year — $75 million of that on debts delinquent for more than 10 years, said Jeffrey Schramek, assistant commissioner of the department’s debt management service. The aggressive effort to collect old debts started three years ago — the result of a single sentence tucked into the farm bill lifting the 10-year statute of limitations on old debts to Uncle Sam.

No one seems eager to take credit for reopening all these long-closed cases. A Social Security spokeswoman says the agency didn’t seek the change; ask Treasury. Treasury says it wasn’t us; try Congress. Congressional staffers say the request probably came from the bureaucracy.

The only explanation the government provides for suddenly going after decades-old debts comes from Social Security spokeswoman Dorothy Clark: “We have an obligation to current and future Social Security beneficiaries to attempt to recoup money that people received when it was not due.”

Since the drive to collect on very old debts began in 2011, the Treasury Department has collected $424 million in debts that were more than 10 years old. Those debts were owed to many federal agencies, but the one that has many Americans howling this tax season is the Social Security Administration, which has found 400,000 taxpayers who collectively owe $714 million on debts more than 10 years old. The agency expects to have begun proceedings against all of those people by this summer.

“It was a shock,” said Grice, 58. “What incenses me is the way they went about this. They gave me no notice, they can’t prove that I received any overpayment, and they use intimidation tactics, threatening to report this to the credit bureaus.”

Grice filed suit against the Social Security Administration in federal court in Greenbelt this week, alleging that the government violated her right to due process by holding her responsible for a $2,996 debt supposedly incurred under her father’s Social Security number.

Social Security officials told Grice that six people — Grice, her four siblings and her father’s first wife, whom she never knew — had received benefits under her father’s account. The government doesn’t look into exactly who got the overpayment; the policy is to seek compensation from the oldest sibling and work down through the family until the debt is paid.

The Federal Trade Commission, on its Web site, advises Americans that “family members typically are not obligated to pay the debts of a deceased relative from their own assets.” But Social Security officials say that if children indirectly received assistance from public dollars paid to a parent, the children’s money can be taken, no matter how long ago any overpayment occurred.

“While we are responsible for collecting delinquent debts owed to taxpayers, we understand the importance of ensuring that debtors are treated fairly,” Treasury’s Schramek said in a statement responding to questions from The Washington Post. He said Treasury requires that debtors be given due process.

Social Security spokeswoman Clark, who declined to discuss Grice’s or any other case, even with the taxpayer’s permission, said the agency is “sensitive to concerns about our attempts to arrange repayment of overpayments.” She said that before taking any money, Social Security makes “multiple attempts to contact debtors via the U.S. Mail and by phone.”

Grice, who works for the Food and Drug Administration and lives in Takoma Park, in the same apartment she’s resided in since 1984, never got any notice about a debt.

Social Security officials told her they had sent their notice to her post office box in Roxboro, N.C. Grice rented that box from 1977 to 1979 and never since. And Social Security has Grice’s current address: Every year, it sends her a statement about her benefits.

“Their record-keeping seems to be very spotty,” she said.

Treasury officials say that before they will take someone’s refund, the agency owed the money must certify the debt, meaning there must be evidence of the overpayment. But Social Security officials told Grice they had no records explaining the debt.

“The craziest part of this whole thing is the way the government seizes a child’s money to satisfy a debt that child never even knew about,” says Robert Vogel, Grice’s attorney. “They’ll say that somebody got paid for that child’s benefit, but the child had no control over the money and there’s no way to know if the parent ever used the money for the benefit of that kid.”

Grice, the middle of five children, said neither of her surviving siblings — one older, one younger — has had any money taken by the government. When Grice asked why she had been selected to pay the debt, she was told it was because she had an income and her address popped up — the correct one this time.

Grice found a lawyer willing to take her case without charge. Vogel is exercised about the constitutional violations he sees in the retroactive lifting of the 10-year limit on debt collection. “Can the government really bring back to life a case that was long dead?” the lawyer asked. “Can it really be right to seize a child’s money to satisfy a parent’s debt?”

But many other taxpayers whose refunds have been taken say they’ve been unable to contest the confiscations because of the cost, because Social Security cannot provide records detailing the original overpayment, and because the citizens, following advice from the IRS to keep financial documents for just three years, had long since trashed their own records.

In Glenarm, Ill., Brenda and Mike Samonds have spent the past year trying to figure out how to get back the $189.10 tax refund the government seized, claiming that Mike’s mother, who died 33 years ago, had been overpaid on survivor’s benefits after Mike’s father died in 1969.

“It was never Mike’s money, it was his mother’s,” Brenda Samonds said. “The government took the money first and then they sent us the letter. We could never get one sentence from them explaining why the money was taken.” The government mailed its notice about the debt to the house Mike’s mother lived in 40 years ago.

The Social Security spokeswoman said the agency uses a private contractor to seek current addresses and is supposed to halt collections if notices are returned as undeliverable.

After hours on the phone trying and failing to get information about the debt Mike’s mother was said to owe, the Samondses gave up.

After waiting on hold for two hours with Social Security last week, Ted Verbich also concluded it wasn’t worth the time or money to fight for the $172 the government intercepted last month.

In 1977, Verbich, now 57, was in college at the University of Maryland when he took a full-time job in an accountant’s office. Because he was earning income, he knew he had to give up the survivor’s benefits his mother had received since his father died, when Verbich was 4. But his $70 monthly checks — “They helped with the car payment,” he said — kept coming for a short time after he started work, and Verbich was notified in 1978 that he had to repay about $600. He did.

Thirty-six years later, with no notice, “they snatched my Maryland tax refund,” said Verbich, a federal worker who has lived at the same address in Glendale, Md,. for 30 years and regularly receives Social Security statements there. The feds insisted that he owed $172 but could provide no documents to back up the claim.

Verbich has given up on getting his refund, but he wants a receipt stating that his debt to his country is resolved.

“I’ll put in the request,” a Social Security clerk told Verbich, “but in reality, you’ll never get anything.”

Grice was also told there was little point in seeking a waiver of her debt. Collections can only be halted if the person passes two tests, Clark said: The taxpayer must prove that he “is without fault, and [that] repayment of the overpayment would deprive the person of income needed for ordinary living expenses.”

More than 1,200 appeals have been filed on the old cases, Clark said; taxpayers have won about 10 percent of those appeals.

The Treasury initially held the full amount of Grice’s federal and state refunds, a total of $4,462. Last week, after The Washington Post inquired about Grice’s case, the government returned the portion of her refund above the $2,996 owed on her father’s account.

But unless the feds can prove that she ever received any of the overpayment, Grice wants all of her money back.

“Look, I love a good fight, especially for principle,” she said. “My mom used to say, ‘This country is carried on the backs of the little people,’ and now I see what she meant. This is really sad.”

.
.
.
.
The US is too big to fail – Break It Up!
.
.
.

Leave a comment

Filed under business, congress, debt, education, history, just wrong, justice, News, politics, serendipity, SPREAD IT!

11 January 2014

On January 11, 2013 the US Department of Justice drove Aaron Hillel Swartz to his death.

never forget!

.
.

aaron 18:00

.
147 previously unreleased pages related to the Secret Service investigation of Aaron Swartz

.
.
whistleblowers held captive or dead
snowden

.
awaken the power

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Leave a comment

Filed under #OWS, art, business, computers, congress, education, history, justice, music, News, poetry, politics, science and technology, video